Compare Β· SOL spot ETFs
BSOL vs FSOL
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF against Fidelity Solana Fund
- BSOL is cheaper: 0.20% vs 0.25% a year, or $0.50 less per $1,000 held.
- BSOL is 5.6x the size of FSOL by net assets.
Verdict: BSOL
BSOL is both the cheaper and the larger fund, so it is the default pick unless you need FSOL for a specific brokerage or account.
Fees: what the expense ratio costs you
BSOL charges 0.20% and FSOL charges 0.25% a year. On a $10,000 position that is $20 versus $25 per year, taken out of the fund's assets daily rather than billed to you. Over five years the gap compounds to roughly $25 per $10,000 in BSOL's favour, before any return.
Size and liquidity
BSOL holds about $1.3B against $239M for FSOL. A larger fund usually means tighter bid-ask spreads and more options volume, which matters if you trade around the open rather than hold for years. The five-day flow row shows which fund investors are adding to right now; see the full daily table on the flows page.
Pre-market estimate accuracy
Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate has landed closer to the official open for FSOL (median miss 0.04%) than for BSOL (0.11%). Both are re-priced every minute from live Solana on the BSOL and FSOL pages, with the method on the accuracy page.
FAQ
- Is BSOL or FSOL cheaper?
- BSOL, at 0.20% a year versus 0.25% for FSOL.
- Which is bigger, BSOL or FSOL?
- BSOL, with about $1.3B in net assets against $239M for FSOL.
- Do BSOL and FSOL move together?
- Yes. Both hold Solana, so their daily returns are nearly identical before fees. The lasting differences are the expense ratio, fund size and how tightly each trades to its net asset value.
Both funds hold SOL, so their daily moves are nearly identical; the lasting differences are fees, size and liquidity. Estimate miss is how far Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate landed from the official 9:30 AM ET open (see accuracy). Flows are US spot ETF net flows from SoSoValue. Not investment advice.