Compare Β· XRP spot ETFs
XRPC vs GXRP
Canary XRP ETF against Grayscale XRP Trust ETF
- GXRP is cheaper: 0.35% vs 0.50% a year, or $1.50 less per $1,000 held.
- XRPC is 3.8x the size of GXRP by net assets.
Verdict: XRPC or GXRP?
GXRP costs less each year; XRPC is the larger, more liquid fund. Long-term holders usually weight the fee, active traders the liquidity.
Fees: what the expense ratio costs you
XRPC charges 0.50% and GXRP charges 0.35% a year. On a $10,000 position that is $50 versus $35 per year, taken out of the fund's assets daily rather than billed to you. Over five years the gap compounds to roughly $75 per $10,000 in GXRP's favour, before any return.
Size and liquidity
XRPC holds about $373M against $97M for GXRP. A larger fund usually means tighter bid-ask spreads and more options volume, which matters if you trade around the open rather than hold for years. The five-day flow row shows which fund investors are adding to right now; see the full daily table on the flows page.
Pre-market estimate accuracy
Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate has landed closer to the official open for XRPC (median miss 0.15%) than for GXRP (0.19%). Both are re-priced every minute from live XRP on the XRPC and GXRP pages, with the method on the accuracy page.
FAQ
- Is XRPC or GXRP cheaper?
- GXRP, at 0.35% a year versus 0.50% for XRPC.
- Which is bigger, XRPC or GXRP?
- XRPC, with about $373M in net assets against $97M for GXRP.
- Do XRPC and GXRP move together?
- Yes. Both hold XRP, so their daily returns are nearly identical before fees. The lasting differences are the expense ratio, fund size and how tightly each trades to its net asset value.
Both funds hold XRP, so their daily moves are nearly identical; the lasting differences are fees, size and liquidity. Estimate miss is how far Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate landed from the official 9:30 AM ET open (see accuracy). Flows are US spot ETF net flows from SoSoValue. Not investment advice.