Compare Β· XRP spot ETFs
XRPC vs TOXR
Canary XRP ETF against 21Shares XRP ETF
- XRPC is 2.3x the size of TOXR by net assets.
Verdict: XRPC or TOXR?
The two funds charge the same, so size decides: XRPC is the larger and typically the more liquid of the pair.
Fees: what the expense ratio costs you
XRPC charges 0.50% and TOXR charges 0.50% a year. On a $10,000 position that is $50 versus $50 per year, taken out of the fund's assets daily rather than billed to you. With identical fees, cost is not a reason to prefer either fund.
Size and liquidity
XRPC holds about $373M against $160M for TOXR. A larger fund usually means tighter bid-ask spreads and more options volume, which matters if you trade around the open rather than hold for years. The five-day flow row shows which fund investors are adding to right now; see the full daily table on the flows page.
Pre-market estimate accuracy
Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate has landed closer to the official open for XRPC (median miss 0.15%) than for TOXR (1.31%). Both are re-priced every minute from live XRP on the XRPC and TOXR pages, with the method on the accuracy page.
FAQ
- Is XRPC or TOXR cheaper?
- They charge the same expense ratio, 0.50% a year.
- Which is bigger, XRPC or TOXR?
- XRPC, with about $373M in net assets against $160M for TOXR.
- Do XRPC and TOXR move together?
- Yes. Both hold XRP, so their daily returns are nearly identical before fees. The lasting differences are the expense ratio, fund size and how tightly each trades to its net asset value.
Both funds hold XRP, so their daily moves are nearly identical; the lasting differences are fees, size and liquidity. Estimate miss is how far Pre-Tick's pre-market estimate landed from the official 9:30 AM ET open (see accuracy). Flows are US spot ETF net flows from SoSoValue. Not investment advice.